"No longer, of course. Those of us who live in St. Louis County are going to have a chance to vote this November on a plan to limit smoking. The plan would ban smoking in many so-called public places. I say so-called because the ban would impact restaurants which are owned by private individuals. I have a hard time thinking of them as public places.
To me, privately owned means privately owned. If the owner wants to cater to non-smokers — and we're the majority — he or she can ban smoking.
Bear in mind, too, that the ban is not absolute. If food is less than 25 percent of an establishment's gross income, the establishment can apply for an exemption. Also, casinos are exempt. Also, private clubs are exempt.
These exemptions would seem to put the lie to the notion that we are attempting to do this for the sake of the employees who would otherwise be exposed to secondhand smoke. Why should the employees of a casino be any less deserving of our protection than the employees of a restaurant? What about employees at private clubs?
Of course, the supporters of the ban would argue that this is just a start.
To me, that's frightening."
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/billmcclellan/story/81AEC0169D7049D08625761900099CEE?OpenDocument
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Bill McClellan on County Smoking Ban
Posted by Bill Hannegan at 9:20 PM
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|