Jim Roos should be allowed to keep his sign along 44. That sort of freedom of expression doesn't hurt St. Louis. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch feels otherwise.http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/editorialcommentary/story/A87D004744732E6F8625754F0004A4A9?OpenDocument
If you watch this video to the end, you find that Roos is not totally agaisnt eminent domain. I wonder if Roos opposed the taking of 20North by St. Louis University?